Improved Box for Carriage Hubs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The great inconvenience attending carriage hubs is that there is always a difficulty in keeping them well greased ; and the boxes are, when arranged so as to be easily accessible, very liable to become filled with dirt. Our engravings represent a device which, it is said, overcomes these evils, and is particularly adapted for the English mail axle, although it is applicable to light or heavy * wheels. Fig. 1 is a view of the hub with the p. invention applied; Fig. 2 shows the outside !.( end of the hub, a; and Fig. 3 a section g? through it. A is the hub, the axle box, c the lubri-;ating groove, and C a piece cast into it, riiich is let into a corresponding slot in the iub; through a hole in this passes a semi-;ylindrical tube having at the end a screw, 1 (seen at e,) and separated at Fig. 4, which also represents the box. The advantage of this is that the screw can be easily removed, and oil supplied, and in the removal it brings with it a small quantity of dirt, and by its shape it always tends to keep the channel in which it lies clean. The firm who have purchased the English patent have called it the " United States Axle Box," and by this name it will become generally known, thus taking the place of the English axle box, which is at present considered the best. It is the invention of Dr. A. C. Garratt, No. 83 Eustis street, Koxbury, Mass., from whom all further particulars can be obtained. Patented February 26, 1857.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 10This article was published with the title “Improved Box for Carriage Hubs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 10 (), p. 76
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11141857-76c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe