Improved Dynamometer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That disease which annually afflicts our country, and which may truly be called the "show fever," when any one who has an invention of any kind takes it to the State fair, and exhibits it to an appreciative multitude, is quickly coming—the season of exhibitions and fairs will soon be upon us, and we have to call attention to a most useful invention, which will be of great value to the judges who award the prizes. The invention which our engravings illustrate—Fig. 1 being a front elevation, and Fig. 2 a back view—is a dynamometer of simple and improved construction, the invention of G. and ,T. W. Gibbs, of Canton, Ohio, and patented by them August 26, 1856. It is suitable, and will, we have no doubt, be extensively used for trying the draft of wagons, plows, reapers, mowers, c, and the strength of cattle, horses, c. ; in fact, it measures force in nearly all of its thousand applications. It consists, as will be seen on reference to the , engravings, of an elliptical spring, the advan-|tages of which over the spiral (usually em- ployed) are too well-known to need recapitulation. The spring, A, is flattened out at its ends, B, and to the upper branch is attached an index, C, on which two pointers, D and E, moving on an axis, F, indicate the power exerted. One end, B, being attached to the ob-j ect whose draft is to be tested, the horse or other motive power is attached to the other end, and as the strain comes on the spring it brings the two curves, A, nearer together ; in so doing the bar, H, being attached at G to one curve, is pushed up, and being pivoted to a lever, I, on a small gear wheel, J, it turns that partly round, and so moves K, which is rigidly connected to the axis, F. This, of course, causes the pointer, D, to move round the dial, and the whole being proportioned and graduated correctly, the indicator, E, being only loosely placed on the axis, F, vibrates as the implement to be tested is drawn along, and indicates the average draft very accu rately. It is light, simple, and perfect in its opera- tion, and is manufactured, or the patent is for sale by Gibbs &Danner, of Canton, Ohio, who will give any further particulars. The committee of the Ohio State Board of Agriculture highly commend it; and the Secretary says that " it is the only instrument of the kind he is acquainted with that is at all times reliable."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 46This article was published with the title “Improved Dynamometer” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 46 (), p. 364
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07241858-364c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe