Improved Spike Machine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Measures to secure a patent for an impro ved Spike Machine, have been taken by John B. Richardson, James Westerman, and Eben ezer Wilder, of North Castle, Pennsylva nia. ' In this machine the inventors em ploy an original mode of forming the point the spike, which they accomplish by means rollers attached to slides, and working on adjustable beds, so that by placing the beds in a more or less oblique relation to the spike, a shorter or longer point is given to the latter by the pressure ot the roller. To relieve the ends of the jaws from the pressure of the spike head, so that they can separate freely it is proposed to give the header a return motion before the jaws are parted. There is also an efficient plan for holding the rod which forms the spike material whilst the requisite length is being cut off. The working parts the machine are all moved by a shaft carrying five cams, so placed as to properly time the several operations of cutting, heading, anc pointing. The initial process is to pass a rot of iron through a loop, and upon an under die whilst a gauge regulates the length, when a knife cuts off the piece, the holder and under die securely holding it in the meanwhile The piece of iron is then pressed between the two jawg and the upper die, which ie intended to press upon the spike, and directly over the rollers which are now advanced until they come nearly or quite in contact. The header is moved instantaneously with the roller carriages until, having executed its duty, it recedes a little, and the spike being now completed is allowed to escape.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 24This article was published with the title “Improved Spike Machine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 24 (), p. 188
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02261853-188

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe