Improvement in Buckets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This invention illustrates the fact that even in articles of common and universal use there yet remains opportunity for improvement. W ho would have thought there could yet be a useful modification of the form of the bucket. Improved machines for its manufacture, for cutting staves, heading, etc., might well be expected ; but the thing itself was generally supposed as perfect as it was possible to make it. Nevertheless, here we have a real improvement, the object being to enable two persons to comfortably and easily carry a large bucket when filled with a heavy fluid, when the labor of one is not adequate to the purpose. The invention is simply a combination of handles with the ordinary bail, and is equally applicable to all sort3 of bailed vessels, as pots, kettles, etc., which have hitherto required the use of the bail. By reference to the engraving it will be seen that when the bail is in use the handles are turned down out of the way, and when the handles are employed the bail is turned down. The device is extremely simple and cannot fail to be useful. Patented through the Scientific American Patent Agency, June 1, 1869, by John H. Tomlinson, of Chicago, 111. Hell Gate Obstructions. We learn from the Brooklyn Daily Times that, as the Shel-burne plan of drilling and blasting the rocks at Hell Gate has failed, there are capitalists ready and willing to risk large sums upon the success of the apparatus invented by Mr. Samuel Lewis, illustrated and described on page 385, Vol. XX, of tne Scientific American. That paper has no doubt that Mr. Lewis and his supporters will guarantee the removal of tlie obstructions for half the estimate made by General Newton on the tunneling project, which, it asserts, is a pet scheme of General Newton's. If these statements are correct, it would seem only reasonable that the invention of Mr. Lewis should be tried, and, if found to answer the expectations formed in regard to it, al-owed to proceed with the work. The Times charges that General Newton is so in love with his own project that he is incapable of forming an impartial judgment on the merits of Mr. Lewis' plan. We are sorry that this should have been said, or even thought, as we believe it is unjust to General Newton, and may be injurious to the interests of Mr. Lewis, who, we are confident, does not entertain the opinion expressed by the Times. We trust that for the satisfaction of all parties, a trial of Mr. Lewis' inven tion will be permitted. Application of Lelchtenlberg's Experiment to tne Mlneraloglcal Analysis of Rocks. M. S. Meunier proposes to make use of the well-known experiment of Leichtenberg's electric figures to separate from each other the divers mineralogical constituents of some kinds of rock. We briefly remind our readers that the experiment alluded to consists in charging with electricity a cake of resin or sealing wax, by means of a previously-charged Leyden jar; it is thus possible to charge certain portions of the cake with positive, others with negative electricity. In order to exhibit this to sight it is usual to blow, by means of a small pair of bellows, on to the cake of the resin, a mixture of very finely powdered red lead and sulphur ; the friction, on leaving the nozzle, causes the powders to become electrified, and the sulphur being negatively electric is attracted by the curved figures positively eleetric on the cake, while the red leau follows the opposite course. M. Meunier has tried thus to separate sulphur-bearing trachite into its mineral constituents, and succeeded perfectly in getting the sulphide and feldspar from each other ; he states that he has equally well succeeded with rocks made up of two different silicates.— Cosmos. IN England a huge steam hammer, weighing 1,000 tuns, is being made for the Russian Government. The hammer head weighs 42 tuns, the anvil block 500 tuns, and it is to be used in forging steel guns.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 21 Issue 11This article was published with the title “Improvement in Buckets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 21 No. 11 (), p. 168
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican09111869-168

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe