Improvement in Starch Gum and Grape Sugar Manufacture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mr. Hoffmann, a chemist in Beardstown, Ill., has invented an improved method of converting starch, corn or other grain into dextrin gum or grape sugar. He uses steam, diluted acid and water, at a much higher temperature than the boiling point of water in an enclosed and steam tight mash tub. To every bushel of grain about twelve gallons of boiling water are used, and an additional quantity in proportion to the pressure of the steam j one or two per cent of the weight of corn, of weak sulphuric acid is also employed. These are gradually added. together, and mashed under steam pressure for two or three hours, the starch of the corn 11 converted into dextrin, and by the addition of chalk or marole dust to neutralize the acid while at the atmospheric pressure, and when all the acid has been neutralized and the whole has stood for an hour or so, the starch gum can be obtained by evaporationj by continuing the steaming process for a longer period grape sugar is obtained. This process considerably cheapens the manufacture of alcohol, and for the benefit of such as may be interested, we give the claim of the patent : " What I claim as my improvement is the combination of steam and acids for converting starch, corn or other cereals into dcxtrin, gum, or sugar, when said grain is subjected to the action of diluted acids and the temperature of the mass is elevated to 225° or 300°

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 48This article was published with the title “Improvement in Starch Gum and Grape Sugar Manufacture” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 48 (), p. 377
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08071858-377

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe