Improvement in the Production of “Bleu de France” on Wool

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


USEFUL RECEIPTS The method now employed for producing " bleu de France," consists in boiling the wool in a bath containing ferridcyanide of potassium, an acid and chloride of tin, until a pure blue is produced. During this process a large amount of cyanogen is lost as hydrocyanic acid. To obviate this loss the process has been so modified as to precipitate the whole, or the greater part, of the cyanogen upon the fibres of the wool, in combination with iron. This object may be accomplished by adding a salt of iron to the bath, by preference the ses-quichloride. The dyeing is performed as follows :The ferridcyanide of potassium is first dissolved in the bath, then a small portion of the acid to be used, and fctiy the chloride of tin and iron. The liquid is now clear, and has a brownish color. The. wool, well washed, is put in while warm, and the bath heated to boiling. The wool at once takes a dark green color, and, after adding the remainder of the acid, becomes, on further boiling, a beautiful blue. In this manner, a given shade of color was produced with 25 per cent, less ferridcyanide than in the usual process. Experiments undertaken to ascertain the best proportions for adding chloride of iron, proved that the maximum effect was given by employing chloride equal to half or three-fourths the weight of the ferrocyanide. A larger amount gave a fainter color. The chloride was solution of iron in muriatic acid, through which chlorine has been passed. Less acid is here required than in the common process, and the tartaric proved most satisfactory. The ferridcyanide used must be perfectly free from ferrocyanide, oiherwise the addition of sesqui-chloride of iron would determine a precipitate of Prussian blue. [The above is from the " Notes by a Practical Chemist " in the " London Artisan." The author of said notes appears to be well posted up in applied chemistry, and often supplies very excellent articles. The article above is a description of a modification in dyeing the " Royal Blue,"old Prussian blue. The common method of dyeing this color, is to give about one ounce of the yellow prussiate of potash to one of wool, along with an ounce of tartar and one ounce of the chloride of tin. These substances are put into the dye kettle at lOOo dissolved, and then the wool is put in and the liquor brought up to 212" when the goods are taken out and about the same quantity of the chloride of tin added ; when the goods are again entered and the liquor brought to a boil, when the beautiful rich blue soon appears. Logwood added to the liquor makes a dark deep blue. Some recommend preparing the goods by boiling them first in a weak solution of the nitrate of iron, then washing well for the process described. In Prussia a patent is granted only f i six years, and it must be put in operation six monthsaf:er having teen granted.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 17This article was published with the title “Improvement in the Production of “Bleu de France” on Wool” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 17 (), p. 129
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01081853-129

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe