In Brief, December 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

THE 2007 NOBEL PRIZES

The awards feature a rarity—scientists won the Peace Prize, the first time since 1995. Two of this year's Nobelists have written for Scientific American: Mario Capecchi and former vice president Al Gore—three if you count the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Physiology or Medicine: Mario Capecchi of the University of Utah, Martin Evans of Cardiff University and Oliver Smithies of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for their discoveries leading to gene targeting in mice. This “knockout” process inactivates individual genes to reveal their true functions.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Physics: Albert Fert of the University of Paris-South and Peter Grünberg of the German Research Center in Jülich, for their discovery of giant magnetoresistance, in which weak magnetic changes could cause big differences in electrical resistance. The iPod and other hard-drive devices owe their existence to this effect.

Chemistry: Gerhard Ertl of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society in Berlin, for his development of methods to study surface reactions—crucial for insights into many processes, such as the rusting of iron, the reactions that produce artificial fertilizers and even the destruction of the ozone layer.

Peace: The IPCC and Al Gore, for their efforts to spread knowledge about human-induced climate change and to lay the foundation to combat it.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American