New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

In Brief, January 2008

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

FASTBALLS FROM BLACK HOLES

A network of 1,400 ground-based particle detectors and two dozen telescopes has located the possible origin of the highest-energy cosmic rays. Traveling at near light speed, these rays—most likely protons—pack 10

20 electron volts, 100 million times the energy produced by the largest particle accelerators and roughly equivalent to that of a fast-pitch baseball. The source appears to be nearby active galactic nuclei: bright galactic cores probably powered by supermassive black holes. Scientists say they would never have guessed that black holes might have such powers if not for high-energy cosmic rays. —JR Minkel


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MOTHER'S MILK AND IQ

The fatty acids in human milk may boost IQ. Breast-fed infants with at least one copy of a common variant of the gene FADS2 had IQ scores that were six to seven points higher than those of nonnursed kids with similar genetics. But breast-feeding did not appear to affect those children (10 percent of the study population) with only a less common version of FADS2. The gene variants may affect the conversion of dietary precursors to long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, which aggregate in the brain after birth. Alternatively, the fatty acids may act on the gene itself, causing it to affect the metabolic processing of the acids. —Nikhil Swaminathan

ROBO BUDDY

For robots to be accepted as human peers (as Bender is on Futurama), it might just take a light touch. Scientists introduced a classroom of toddlers—who naturally had no preconceived notions regarding droids—to a two-foot-tall humanoid robot, QRIO, which giggled when its head was touched. Over time, the children bonded with QRIO, touching it as they did other humans. After five months, the children treated QRIO as a near equal, even covering it with a blanket and telling it “night night” when its batteries ran out. But when the robot was reprogrammed just to dance, the toddlers lost interest. The findings appear in the November 13 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. —Charles Q.Choi

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “In Brief” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-32a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe