In Brief, April 2009

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

LEAVES FOR LEAVING ALONE

The vast majority of grasses retain their lifeless leaves, raising the question of why they keep dead weight that could drain their productivity. To find out, scientists at the University of Buenos Aires removed dead leaves from grass in the Argentine pampas, where cattle graze. In the absence of cows, the pruning promoted grass growth, but in the presence of bovines, those grasses were grazed on more so than intact ones, resulting in less growth. The findings, published online January 15 by Oikos, suggest that dead leaves act as a defense against herbivores. —Charles Q. Choi

QUITTERS' CASH


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the threat of lung cancer and wrinkles doesn't work, maybe $750 will. Cigarette smokers who received money to quit were 2.9 times more likely to break the habit than those who just tried to do it for their health. Participants were offered $100 to complete a smoking cessation program, $250 for quitting within the first six months and $400 for keeping clean an additional six months. Even after that, those who got the cash were 2.6 times more likely to have stayed smoke-free. The study appears in the February 11 New England Journal of Medicine. —Coco Ballantyne

WHEN ORBITS COLLIDE

In an orbital traffic accident 490 miles above Siberia, a Russian satellite and a commercial satellite owned by U.S. communications firm Iridium collided in February. It wasn't exactly unexpected, given the number of objects in orbit—the past 20 years has seen three other accidents, but they were minor, only producing a few pieces of debris. This latest impact, however, yielded hundreds, and some pieces have drifted down to the altitude of the International Space Station, posing a small but still real hazard. —John Matson

Scientific American Magazine Vol 300 Issue 4This article was published with the title “In Brief” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 4 (), p. 31
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0409-31d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe