In Case You Missed It

Top news from around the world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

U.S.

Researchers modeled noise levels in nearly 500 wilderness and park locations and found that more than half of them were twice as loud as the environment would be without human-generated sounds. This cacophony could inhibit animals' hunting, mating and other survival behaviors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


CHINA

Some caterpillar pests have grown resistant to genetically modified (GM) crops designed to be toxic to them. But researchers have developed a hybrid of GM and nonmodified cotton that keeps one species of caterpillar susceptible to the plant's deadly proteins.

SOUTH AFRICA

Newly discovered weapon remnants suggest humans were using a delicate, skillful stone-sharpening technique called pressure flaking to finely shape points for spears and other hunting tools as early as 77,000 years ago.

RUSSIA

A study of animal bones collected from the Berelyokh site in the Siberian republic of Sakha indicates that mammoths may have suffered from human diseases, including osteoporosis, a possible factor in their extinction. A lack of minerals in their diet may have made the animals susceptible.

INDIA

Analyses of scat, blood and tissue show that two populations of endangered Bengal tigers in the Himalaya foothills are not breeding enough to maintain genetic diversity. Researchers say that relocating villages and halting mining could encourage more mingling between those groups.

Andrea Marks is a former Scientific American editorial intern.

More by Andrea Marks
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Quick Hits” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 1 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0717-22

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe