In Honeybee Dance, Direction Is Key

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have long marveled over the dance of the honeybee. In fact, close observation has even enabled them to read the insect's waggle performance. Yet despite years of study, new insight into the creature's unusual form of communication continues to come to light. According to findings published today in the journal Nature, honeybee dances do not convey absolute distances to the food source. Rather they impart the direction of the food and the distance the bee thinks it has traveled, based on the amount of scenery it has passed by.

To explore how foraging honeybees gauge distance, Harald E. Esch of the University of Notre Dame and his colleagues trained bees to forage from a feeder placed at varying distances beyond the far end of an eight-meter-long tunnel. Next the team studied how the bees back at the hive interpreted the performances given by the returning foragers. The recruits took off in the correct direction but overshot the mark. Flying through the tunnel, it seems, tricked the first group of foragers into thinking that they had traveled farther to the feeder than they actually had¿a false impression that they passed along to the recruits.

Instead of calculating absolute distances when mapping the path to nectar, the researchers conclude, honeybees measure distance using what is known as optic flow¿the amount of image motion that appears to occur as the position of the observer changes. Thus the dancer conveys only the direction of the food source and the total amount of image motion that should occur en route. In the case of the experimental bees, "their visually driven odometer misreads distance because the close tunnel walls increase optic flow," Esch and his colleagues explain in their report. "There must be a high selection pressure to ensure that a dance signals the direction of the food source as precisely as possible," the team asserts. "As long as the recruit flies in the same direction as the dancer, she will translate that image motion signalled by the dancer into the correct flight distance and find the goal."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe