In-Person Requests Are More Effective Than Electronic Ones

People respond better to face-to-face requests than e-mails

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When you need a favor, there's nothing more convenient than shooting off an e-mail or two. It also saves you the awkwardness of in-person pleading. Just don't expect the same results.

Two new studies show that people nonetheless believe e-mail requests are just as effective as asking face-to-face. In the first study, published in the March issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 participants were told they would have to ask 10 strangers, either in person or via e-mail, to complete a survey for no pay. People in both groups said they expected one in two strangers to agree, and both were wildly wrong. More than 70 percent of people approached in person complied; among those who received e-mails, the response rate was just 2 percent.

In a second study, people were recruited to complete a paid survey via e-mail or in person. Before they began the paid survey, they were offered the chance to complete a second, unpaid one. Again, canvassers underestimated in-person compliance and overestimated e-mail responses to the unpaid task. The e-mailers had an inflated idea of how much people trusted them and how much empathy they garnered. “If people want to have more effective e-mail messages, they have to include more personal information to facilitate building initial trust,” says Mahdi Roghanizad, a business professor at Western University in Ontario, Canada, who co-wrote the paper.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What about soliciting a friend or colleague? Face-to-face is still best, preliminary data suggest. “When a friend comes to you and asks in person,” Roghanizad says, “it means they are in serious need or respect you enough to pay a visit.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe