New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

In Search of a (Subjective) Fountain of Youth

Research finds a fascinating connection between IQ and aging

As you may have noticed at your last high school reunion, some people age more gracefully than others. Jean Calment, who died in 1997 at the age of 122 and is the world record holder for longest human lifespan, is reported to have stayed mentally sharp her entire life. She took up fencing at 85 and rode a bike until she was 100. At the other extreme, people with early-onset Alzheimer’s may begin experiencing cognitive deficits in their 30s.

People also differ in subjective age—how old they feel. Older adults who report feeling younger than their years tend to be mentally and physically healthier than people who report feeling older. According to one popular view, aging is a “state of mind” that is directly under a person’s control. However, a new study published in the journal Intelligence reveals that the developmental processes that influence subjective age actually begin early in life. People who scored high on an IQ test in their late teens felt younger once they reached their 70s than people who scored lower on the IQ test.

The data were from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (or WLS), which has followed a random sample of 10,317 people born between 1937 and 1940. The participants took an intelligence test in 1957, when they were seniors in high school, while data on education, health and personality were collected in the early 1990s. Then, in 2011, the participants were asked how old they felt most of the time. For each person, the researchers computed an index of subjective age by subtracting this value (“felt age”) from chronological age and dividing the difference by chronological age. Thus, people with a negative score felt older than they actually were, whereas people with a positive score felt younger.    


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On average, the people in the study felt 17 percent younger than their chronological age. For example, a person who was 70 years old reported feeling like they were only 58. However, the difference between chronological age and subjective age varied by intelligence, as assessed by the IQ test given more than 50 years earlier. The people with the highest IQs reported feeling the youngest.

IQ correlates with any number of factors that could explain this correlation, including education. People who score high on intelligence tests are generally more educated than people who score lower. (The correlation between IQ and educational achievement is among the highest correlations observed in psychological research.) In turn, highly educated people secure better paying and less physically strenuous jobs than less educated people and can afford things that might keep them feeling young, from good healthcare to luxury vacations.

As plausible as this explanation seems, statistical analyses revealed that the relationship between IQ and subjective age was explained not by education but by a personality trait: openness to experience. A person high in openness to experience is intellectually curious, independent and imaginative; they prefer variety over routine and enjoy learning and trying new things. Once the researchers statistically controlled for openness to experience, the relationship between IQ and subjective age vanished.

The study helps us understand the relationship between psychological traits measured early life and the aging process. As now documented in large-sample studies from around the world, intelligence predicts longevity: People with high IQs tend to live longer than people with lower IQs. One reason this may be the case is that intelligence tests, in addition to measuring cognitive functioning that bears on people’s ability to make decisions conducive to living a long and healthy life, may capture information about people’s personalities. People who are high in openness to experience may be more likely to seek out information that can be beneficial to their health. Staying abreast of changes in the world, they may also feel more vital than people lower in openness to experience.    

The study also opens avenues of applied research on aging. Both intelligence and personality are relatively stable psychological traits and are not easily changed through intervention. However, interventions that target specific behaviors such as exercising, eating healthy, and becoming civically engaged can improve people’s physical and psychological well-being. One possible consequence of these interventions is that people may begin to feel younger than their years. There may be no fountain of youth, but this type of intervention may at least soften people’s experience of growing older.

David Z. Hambrick is a professor in the cognition and cognitive neuroscience area of the department of psychology at Michigan State University. His research focuses on the origins and underpinnings of expertise and skill.

More by David Z. Hambrick
SA Mind Vol 30 Issue 4This article was published with the title “In Search of a (Subjective) Fountain of Youth” in SA Mind Vol. 30 No. 4 (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0719-15

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe