In Sync, on a Quantum Level

Physicists make two diamonds vibrate as one

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Diamonds have long been available in pairs—say, mounted in a nice set of earrings. Now physicists have managed to entangle the quantum states of two diamonds separated by 15 centimeters. Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon by which two or more objects share an unseen link bridging the space between them—a hypothetical pair of entangled dice, for instance, would always land on matching numbers, even if they were rolled in different places simultaneously. But that link is fragile, and for that reason entanglement experiments on physical systems usually take place in highly controlled laboratory setups—entangling, say, a pair of isolated atoms cooled to nearly absolute zero.

In the new study, scientists at the University of Oxford, the National Research Council of Canada and the National University of Singapore showed that entanglement could also be achieved in more ordinary objects at room temperature, in this case two different squares of synthetically produced diamond, each three millimeters across. The researchers split a laser beam in two and shone it through the diamonds; any photons that scattered off the diamond to generate a phonon, a quantum of vibrational energy, were funneled into a photon detector. The arrival of one of those photons signaled the presence of a vibration in the diamonds.

“We know that somewhere in that apparatus, there is one phonon,” says Ian Walmsley, an experimental physicist at Oxford and a co-author of the study. “But we cannot tell, even in principle, whether that came from the left-hand diamond or the right-hand diamond.” In quantum-mechanical terms, in fact, the phonon is not confined to either diamond. Instead the two diamonds enter an entangled state in which they share one phonon between them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Walmsley notes that the diamonds are not perfect for quantum science—their entanglement is fleeting—but he hopes that investigators will consider using more ordinary materials in quantum technologies. “I think it gives a new scenario and a new instantiation of something that helps point in that direction,” he says. 

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 2This article was published with the title “In Sync, on a Quantum Level” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022012-5DkJrLoewJjEpPLFvriYVV

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe