New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Independent Labs Seek Financial Shelter as Federal Funds Dry Up

Once unfettered labs seek financial shelter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., has long been known for its prodigious output of basic science research on marine animals. For 125 years the MBL has been on a relatively short list of independent labs without a university affiliation. Researchers at these institutes can focus more on discovery than on teaching or other duties, and the institutes themselves are often very specialized, thereby leading to outsize contributions to science.

The independence of the MBL and other labs is quickly eroding. Most of the MBL's operating budget comes from merit-based federal grants, but that could soon change. In June the lab tapped a new funding stream by allying itself with the deep-pocketed University of Chicago. The MBL will retain its own identity, but it remains to be seen how the university's priorities will mesh with the lab's traditional focus and strengths.

The MBL's struggles stem from financial woes at the National Institutes of Health. In the past decade the budget for the country's primary scientific funding arm has stagnated and even declined. Acceptance rates for grant applications have dropped precipitously as a result. More acutely, this year's federal budget sequestration is cutting more than $1.5 billion and about 700 new research grants from the nih. Small, freestanding labs in particular are feeling the crunch.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Boston Biomedical Research Institute shut down last year after a sharp drop in nih funding. Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, primarily financed by patient care revenue and research grants, was bought by Temple University.

Such deals run the risk of spoiling the freewheeling, innovative culture of the small labs, some critics say. “It is a challenge to merge the independent research institute with a university system in a way that preserves a creative atmosphere,” says Greg Patterson, president of the Association of Independent Research Institutes.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Wanted: Science Sugar Daddy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-23b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe