Independent Labs Seek Financial Shelter as Federal Funds Dry Up

Once unfettered labs seek financial shelter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., has long been known for its prodigious output of basic science research on marine animals. For 125 years the MBL has been on a relatively short list of independent labs without a university affiliation. Researchers at these institutes can focus more on discovery than on teaching or other duties, and the institutes themselves are often very specialized, thereby leading to outsize contributions to science.

The independence of the MBL and other labs is quickly eroding. Most of the MBL's operating budget comes from merit-based federal grants, but that could soon change. In June the lab tapped a new funding stream by allying itself with the deep-pocketed University of Chicago. The MBL will retain its own identity, but it remains to be seen how the university's priorities will mesh with the lab's traditional focus and strengths.

The MBL's struggles stem from financial woes at the National Institutes of Health. In the past decade the budget for the country's primary scientific funding arm has stagnated and even declined. Acceptance rates for grant applications have dropped precipitously as a result. More acutely, this year's federal budget sequestration is cutting more than $1.5 billion and about 700 new research grants from the nih. Small, freestanding labs in particular are feeling the crunch.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Boston Biomedical Research Institute shut down last year after a sharp drop in nih funding. Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, primarily financed by patient care revenue and research grants, was bought by Temple University.

Such deals run the risk of spoiling the freewheeling, innovative culture of the small labs, some critics say. “It is a challenge to merge the independent research institute with a university system in a way that preserves a creative atmosphere,” says Greg Patterson, president of the Association of Independent Research Institutes.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Wanted: Science Sugar Daddy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-23b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe