New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Industry Group Wants to Pull Out of Kids' Climate Case

The move is the latest indication of unease about the case among the industry associations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The National Association of Manufacturers is trying to get out of a landmark climate change lawsuit that a group of children filed against the U.S. government.

In court papers submitted yesterday, lawyers for the industrial businesses trade organization indicated they were simply interested in streamlining the case, but otherwise provided little explanation for withdrawing. In 2015, NAM along with the American Petroleum Institute and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers intervened in the youth-led lawsuit against the federal government for allowing decades' worth of greenhouse gas emissions to balloon into the atmosphere, despite its institutional knowledge of climate change.

“Withdrawal would reduce the number of parties to this proceeding and, accordingly, reduce the amount of discovery and avoid the possibility of duplicative discovery efforts and duplicative proceedings,” NAM said in its court filing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The organization must have the judge's permission to break away from the suit.

The request to drop out of the case is the latest indication of unease about the case among the industry associations. Intervening in the case exposed the trade associations, and possibly their member companies, to discovery and requests for records from the plaintiffs. And before NAM's latest court documents were filed, multiple people with knowledge of the lawsuit told E&E News that one, two or all three of the industry groups could soon pull out of the litigation.

Their withdrawals could happen as soon as this week, sources said.

Disagreements among the trade groups over case strategy, concerns that internal documents from the trade groups and member companies could become public through the discovery process, and differences in opinion about climate change among member companies at the groups have created tensions, they said.

A spokesman for API declined to comment, citing a policy for pending lawsuits. Representatives for AFPM and NAM did not respond to requests for comment.

Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based organization behind the lawsuit, is trying to depose Cabinet secretaries about climate change and has sent sweeping requests for documentation from federal agencies.

The plaintiffs say the federal government has repeatedly infringed on their rights, including the opportunity to live in a safe and stable environment, by allowing and often accelerating carbon emissions through its actions.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe