Industry Group Wants to Pull Out of Kids' Climate Case

The move is the latest indication of unease about the case among the industry associations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The National Association of Manufacturers is trying to get out of a landmark climate change lawsuit that a group of children filed against the U.S. government.

In court papers submitted yesterday, lawyers for the industrial businesses trade organization indicated they were simply interested in streamlining the case, but otherwise provided little explanation for withdrawing. In 2015, NAM along with the American Petroleum Institute and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers intervened in the youth-led lawsuit against the federal government for allowing decades' worth of greenhouse gas emissions to balloon into the atmosphere, despite its institutional knowledge of climate change.

“Withdrawal would reduce the number of parties to this proceeding and, accordingly, reduce the amount of discovery and avoid the possibility of duplicative discovery efforts and duplicative proceedings,” NAM said in its court filing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The organization must have the judge's permission to break away from the suit.

The request to drop out of the case is the latest indication of unease about the case among the industry associations. Intervening in the case exposed the trade associations, and possibly their member companies, to discovery and requests for records from the plaintiffs. And before NAM's latest court documents were filed, multiple people with knowledge of the lawsuit told E&E News that one, two or all three of the industry groups could soon pull out of the litigation.

Their withdrawals could happen as soon as this week, sources said.

Disagreements among the trade groups over case strategy, concerns that internal documents from the trade groups and member companies could become public through the discovery process, and differences in opinion about climate change among member companies at the groups have created tensions, they said.

A spokesman for API declined to comment, citing a policy for pending lawsuits. Representatives for AFPM and NAM did not respond to requests for comment.

Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based organization behind the lawsuit, is trying to depose Cabinet secretaries about climate change and has sent sweeping requests for documentation from federal agencies.

The plaintiffs say the federal government has repeatedly infringed on their rights, including the opportunity to live in a safe and stable environment, by allowing and often accelerating carbon emissions through its actions.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe