New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Infants Are Born to Talk

Premature infants reveal how our brain is primed for language

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Newborn babies can recognize the sound of their mother's voice at birth. But scientists are unsure which aspects of language are built into our brain through genetics and which are learned by listening in the womb. To investigate this question, a group of researchers in France studied 12 preterm infants, who were born two to three months' premature. At this stage brain connections are just beginning to form, meaning the infants' brain activity reflects the brain's initial organization rather than connections strengthened by learning, according to the researchers.

In the study, the scientists placed functional optical-imaging bands on the babies' heads to noninvasively monitor brain activity by passing infrared light through the infants' thin skulls. The light is absorbed or scattered depending on oxygen levels in the blood, which is a proxy for brain activity. The infants listened to male or female voices speaking simple sounds, such as “ga” or “ba.” The optical imaging revealed that the premature baby's brain could distinguish not only a speaker's gender but also the similar syllables. “What's really interesting is that the baby's brain can use the same sound networks we use later as an adult,” says neuroscientist Fabrice Wallois of INSERM at the University of Picardy Jules Verne in France.

This finding suggests that the neural connections used in adult language processing are present from very early in development, supporting the hypothesis that we are hardwired to understand some aspects of speech.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe