Infants Should Be Fed Peanuts to Stave Off Allergies

Contrary to past guidance, new recommendations call for early introduction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Federal health officials on Thursday issued new food allergy guidelines that could help reduce peanut allergies among children — and that, contrary to past guidance, call for parents to give babies foods containing peanuts as early as 4 to 6 months of age.

The new guidelines from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, reflect an improved scientific understanding of the best ways to prevent the development of allergies.

“There is this magic window of opportunity, where you can introduce peanut-containing foods,” said Dr. David Stukus, a pediatric allergist in Ohio and a coauthor of the new guidelines.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Our immune system undergoes dramatic development and maturation during the first years of life,” he added. “We introduce peanut-containing foods early, the immune system can get used to it.”

The guidelines vary based on an infant’s perceived risk.

The agency recommends the introduction of peanut-containing foods as early as 4 to 6 months for infants at high risk of developing a peanut allergy — those who have severe eczema or an egg allergy — though those infants should first be seen by an allergy specialist.

Children who face a moderate risk of developing a peanut allergy — those with mild to moderate eczema — should have foods with peanuts starting around 6 months of age. Those children need not be evaluated by a specialist.

In May, government experts in Australia issued similar guidelines. As in the US, Australia’s medical community once thought that less exposure to allergens was better.

“We ate up the notion that delayed introduction of more allergenic foods in early childhood would help overcome the increasing rates of food allergy,” University of Western Australia researchers wrote in a December study. “Then we promptly spat it out again [as advice] despite limited evidence.”

The thinking is changing fast, said Debbie Palmer, an allergy and immunology researcher and a coauthor of the Australian study.

“Now our guidelines recommend that all infants should be given allergenic foods including peanut butter, cooked egg, dairy, and wheat in the first year of life,” she said. “This includes infants at high risk of allergy.”

The US guidelines take a slightly more cautious approach, in that they explain how to proceed with the introduction of peanuts based on an infant’s risk.

“For a small group there is a need for them to be evaluated first,” said Stukus. “But for the vast majority of infants, it’s going to be safe to introduce the foods at home.”

The guidelines offer several suggestions on foods containing peanuts and caution that they should not be given to infants who are not yet eating solid foods.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on January 5, 2017

Leah Samuel is a staff reporter for STAT. A journalist for over 25 years, Leah's work has appeared in newspapers and magazines across the country, including Harvard Magazine, Labor Notes, The Chicago Reporter, and PublicSource.org. Leah is also a film fan, history buff, science nerd, and trivia nut. When she's not working on a story, she frequently replaces her notebook and pen with yarn and a crochet hook.

More by Leah Samuel

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe