Injectable Implants for Soft-Tissue Reconstruction Help Doctors Save Face

Light-activated polymer may provide non-invasive method of soft-tissue reconstruction.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By George Wigmore of Nature magazine

Injectable, light-activated implants could help to reconstruct soft tissue. The implants offer a less invasive alternative to current techniques for rebuilding tissue lost as a result of trauma or disease; they will be especially useful for facial tissue, which is difficult to reconstruct without scarring or loss of function.

Jennifer Elisseeff, a biomedical engineer at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, and her colleagues developed the implants from a combination of naturally occurring hyaluronic acid and the synthetic polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG). The team publishes its results in Science Translational Medicine today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The implant is injected under the skin as a liquid, then massaged into shape. Light-emitting diodes are then shone onto the skin, triggering a photoinitiator system. This causes links to form between the PEG molecules, creating a solid hydrogel that traps and entangles the particles of hyaluronic acid, fixing the implant into place.

The proportions of hyaluronic acid and PEG used can affect the characteristics of the implant. "We created composite materials that had a synthetic component, which allowed us to control implantation and physical properties," says Elisseeff.

Tailored approach

Currently, soft-tissue implants fall into two general categories, she says. "You can either inject something and once it's in the body do nothing about it, or you can create an external implant which is then surgically implanted."

The latest implants offer a different approach. "By tuning the properties for the material we can match the surrounding mechanical properties, whether you're in more of a fatty area, a muscle area or a skin area," says Elisseeff. This will enable doctors to tailor the implant to the needs of each patient.

"Injecting a hydrogel and fixing the shape in situ is just like a dream," says Zhanfeng Cui, director of the Oxford Centre for Tissue Engineering and Bioprocessing at the University of Oxford, UK. "This team has made the breakthrough by choosing the right photoinitiator and the right wavelength of light."

The implants have better longevity than injectables already in use. The team found that, depending on the mixture of hyaluronic acid and PEG used, their implants kept their volume for at least twice as long as standard implants in rodent models.

But there are still issues to iron out, says Cui. For example, the implants caused more inflammation than was expected in human trials. But despite these obstacles, with the right financial backing the implants could be available within a year, says Elisseeff.

The main focus of the technique is on clinical reconstruction, says Cui, but "it will not be a surprise to see that a much higher number of applications are actually in plastic surgery".

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on July 27, 2011.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe