An Inside Look at a Colonoscopy [Video]

Colon cancer can be beat if detected early. This video from TheVisualMD, incorporating biologically accurate graphics, offers a ride on a camera to show how the disease is detected and treated

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

March is National Colorectal Cancer Awareness month, when public health groups take special pains to promote screening for cancer of the rectum and colon. A leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S., this disease kills about 50,000 people each year; caught early, however, it has a good chance of being cured.

For screening, physicians commonly recommend colonoscopy as the tool of choice: once every 10 years starting at age 50 for people of average risk, earlier and possibly more frequently for those with a family history of colon cancer or other signs of added susceptibility.

Ever wonder what doctors actually see while you're unconscious?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The video here, courtesy of TheVisualMD, lets you view what doctors observe as they thread a thin tube with a camera on its tip through the rectum and colon (comprising the bulk of the large intestine). They do more than watch the camera, they are able to remove polyps—abnormal growths—both to prevent precancerous polyps from becoming malignant and to examine the tissue for signs of cancer. The video also displays a virtual colonoscopy, which scans the intestines with sophisticated, noninvasive imaging tools.

Colonoscopy is not the only screening option. The American Cancer Society, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and others view alternative tests as acceptable as well. Patients can, for instance, collect fecal samples and mail them to a laboratory, which can detect blood in the specimens. But for the analysis to be done properly, the person has to send in samples of three consecutive bowel movements, and the tests do not detect precancerous polyps.

Regardless of how a cancer is found, after diagnosis physicians need to assess the "stage," or extent of its progression, to determine how aggressive treatment needs to be. TheVisualMD offers a lucid description of staging here.

The best way to lower the chances of finding yourself with an advanced stage of colorectal cancer, however, is to undergo the screening. The CDC, which has a program to assist low-income people, argues that if the guidelines were followed, up to 60 percent of deaths from the disease could be prevented.

 Having trouble viewing the video? Click here to go directly to the visualization as provided by TheVisualMD.com

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe