New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Insights from Pregnancy Could Help Fight Cancer

The placenta’s invasion of the uterus holds clues to cancer resistance

Placenta after birth.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To obtain nutrients for a growing fetus, a placenta embeds itself into the uterus—an “invasion” that resembles the way a tumor takes over healthy tissue. Now researchers have identified genes that help to regulate placental embedding and may prove instructive in developing anticancer drugs, according to a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

Scientists knew that the amount a placenta embeds varies across species. In some, such as humans and apes, placenta cells push deep into the uterine wall with relative ease. But in animals like cows and horses, the uterus has evolved to resist such intrusions more strongly. This capability may help protect the maternal immune system and lessen uterus damage when giving birth.

In 2019 cellular biologists Günter Wagner of Yale University and Kshitiz of the University of Connecticut Health found that this cellular resistance extends beyond the uterus. They observed a direct correlation between how deeply a species' placenta embedded and the rate of tumors that spread beyond their primary site in that species' body. Species with highly embedded placentas were associated with higher rates of metastatic cancer; cellular material connecting tissues and organs in these species was less resistant to invasion by both placentas and tumors. The question was why.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For the new study, Kshitiz, Wagner and their colleagues examined nine mammal species for differences in protein production that might explain how some species' tissues resist invasion more strongly. The team identified two proteins that, when produced in abundance, made tissues more susceptible to cellular intrusion—whether from a placenta or a tumor. When the protein-producing genes were removed, cells blocked invasion more effectively.

“A mutation that helps the uterus keep the placenta out also [could affect] the biology of cancer in, say, the skin,” Wagner says.

To Wellcome Sanger Institute cancer biologist Sam Behjati, who was not involved in the study, this finding suggests new ways to target tumor growth and spread. “This is a hard-core, comparative biological study,” he says. Scientists know a lot about the molecular steps required for implantation—and “it would be nice to employ that line of pharmacological thinking for metastases.”

Still, Amy Boddy, a comparative oncologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who was also not involved, cautions that this specific invasion process probably does not tell the whole story. Cancers have a variety of causes and contributors. “Everything that is multicellular is vulnerable to cancer,” Boddy says. “We've just started probing the potential mechanisms.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe