New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Insomnia Worse for Night Owls

Despite getting more sleep than early risers, late-sleeping insomniacs have more emotional distress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ever wish you had the luxury of staying up late and sleeping in? Be careful what you wish for. According to a new study, night owls with insomnia may have a harder time of it than early risers, despite spending more time asleep.

The conclusion comes from 312 insomniacs—those who have trouble falling or staying asleep or who have poor quality sleep—who went to the Stanford Sleep Disorders Clinic in California for group therapy. Patients filled out a series of questionnaires about their sleep habits, mental health and attitudes about sleep.

Researchers categorized each patient as a morning or evening person, or an intermediate case, depending on when they went to bed and the time of day they preferred to do things. Compared with the morning and intermediate types, night owls went to bed an hour or more later but reported more time spent sleeping and more time in bed. On average, they slept 6.4 hours, compared with 5.9 for early risers, and spent 8.7 hours in bed compared with 7.9.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Even after we adjusted for the severity of their insomnia [the amount of time they spent awake in bed], there were still differences between the night owls and the morning people," says Jason Ong, a behavioral sleep psychologist at Stanford University, and lead author of a report published this week in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. For one thing, night owls were less consistent in when they went to bed and got up.

In addition, "they seemed to hold more negative and more rigid beliefs about what their sleep should be," Ong says. Night owls reported feeling less in control of their sleep and feeling that they have a hard time getting through the day with less sleep, which might perpetuate insomnia, the researchers say. And they had more risk factors for depression.

Thirty percent of the population reports some symptoms of insomnia, which can affect a person's job performance and may contribute to depression, obesity, heart disease and diabetes.

The result, Ong says, suggests that night owls suffering from insomnia might need different treatment than morning or day people do, perhaps because of problems with their internal clocks, called the circadian system. "It seemed like, anecdotally, it was a little more difficult to work with night owl types," he says. "This provides some evidence that, hey, there are some differences."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe