Insulin Sets the Pace of Aging

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Similar molecular signals determine the pace of aging in yeast, flies, worms and possibly also in humans, according to three studies published today in the journal Science.

Earlier work had shown that in the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, a chain of signals triggered by an insulin-like hormone controls how long the worm will live. The hormone binds to a cell surface receptor called daf-2 and sets off a signal that, among other things, limits the worm's life span. Worms with certain mutations in the daf-2 gene or other genes in the chain live longer.

The new research reveals that certain mutations in the fruit fly equivalent of daf-2, a gene called InR, have a similar result: female flies carrying these mutations live almost twice as long as their normal counterparts, and males that make it past a certain age also survive longer. The reason for this, Marc Tatar of Brown University and his colleagues conclude, is that the InR mutation leads to a decrease in juvenile hormone, a regulator of aging.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Likewise, altering an insulin-like hormone called CHICO lengthens the life span of flies¿especially females¿geneticist Linda Partridge of University College London and her colleagues report. And in the third study, Valter D. Longo of the University of Southern California and his team found that yeast cells with a mutation in a gene called SCH9, which resembles a player in the worm insulin signaling chain, live three times longer than normal cells.

What may tie these studies in simple organisms together with mammals is caloric restriction: Put on a constant diet, certain mammals live longer than normal. They also have lower levels of insulin in their blood, which suggests that their signaling chain is less active¿similar to that of the mutant worms, flies and yeast cells. Further research will tell if evolution has indeed conserved this mechanism of aging-control across so many different species.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe