Intel Saves Air and Money

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Corporations that design facilities to minimize their environmental impact may earn a financial return, too. That is Intel’s experience as it prepares to open two significant installations: a research and development building in Israel and a $2.5-billion integrated-circuit fabrication plant in China. “We haven’t run out of projects that get a three-year return on investment,” says Todd Brady, Intel’s corporate environmental manager.

Intel’s building in Haifa, due to open early in 2009, will comply with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system. The $600,000 spent on green investments will pay off quickly, with $200,000 in operational savings annually. Space heating, for example, will come from waste heat captured from the crowd of computers in the data center instead of from a conventional boiler system. Three quarters of the occupied office space will receive enough daylight for full lighting, greatly reducing electricity demand.

The fabrication plant in Dalian, China, should open by 2010. With an extensive heat-recovery system, the plant will need only one natural gas boiler, compared with three for similar facilities. Buildings are positioned to exploit the sun’s daily path overhead for light and heat and to bring in cool winds off the bay as needed. Intel also plans for its fabrication plant to emit exceptionally low levels of perfluorinated compound vapors, which contribute to global warming.

SA Special Editions Vol 18 Issue 5sThis article was published with the title “Intel Saves Air and Money” in SA Special Editions Vol. 18 No. 5s (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanearth1208-6b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe