Inter-Oceanic Canal to the Pacific

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lieut. T. A. Craven, U. S. N, has made a report in reference to the practibility of an inter-oceanic communication from the gulf of Darien to the Pacific ocean, by the Atrato and Troando rivers, in which, after giving full details of his late survey, he thus briefly sums up the actual physical difficulties to be overcome in cutting the proposed canal :?— " 1. A cut through some five miles of submerged mud at the mouth of the river, with the prospective certainty of constant dredging to keep it open. 2. The Herculean labor and incalculable expense of cutting through the lagoons of the Truando, and the embedded logs of the Paios Caides, where the whole country is inundated during at least nine months of the year, and where the floods of a day may destroy the work of a week. 8. The vast expense attending the removal of basaltic rock, in a country where labor and provisions must all be imported at most extravagant rates. 4. The want of an anchorage on the Pacific coast. 5. The fatal effects of the climate, which, it may be safely estimated, will disable at least one-third of any force that may be sent there. You will not be surprised that, with the preceding arguments, I am of the opinion that the proposed oanal is impracticable, as involving an expenditure of treasure not easily estimated, and a sacrifice of life from which the stoutest heart may shrink. Human perseverance and ingenuity mar, it is true, overcome the obstacles enumerated; but at least two generations must pass away ere the world can realize the accomplishment of a much less extensive work than that contemplated."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 39This article was published with the title “Inter-Oceanic Canal to the Pacific” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 39 (), p. 307
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06051858-307a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe