Interactive Map: Presidential Battleground States

These will likely be the states where the presidential election is decided. Find out where science and environmental policy issues will play a role

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When John McCain's campaign last week pulled out of Michigan—the state New York Times columnist Frank Rich called "ground zero for the collapsed Main Street economy"—it seemed to signal, along with a widening opinion poll gap between the candidates, that the time had come to reassess the "battleground" states in this election. 

True, Barack Obama had earlier redeployed staff from North Dakota to Minnesota and Wisconsin, where their candidate appeared to have a shot at winning. Now, even Karl Rove, architect of George W. Bush's victories, claims that Obama could win if the election were held today—and projections of broad Democratic gains in House and Senate races have implications for whomever moves into the White House in January. 

But despite flexible strategies among the campaigns as they attempt to cobble a "path to 270" (the number of electoral college votes needed for victory), the struggle will center on eight states where hotly contested races as well as some interesting state propositions and ballot initiatives -- some of which involve science and energy policy -- will be in flux up until Election Day. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Given the margins of error in recent polls, independent voters and those still undecided could still hold the key.

* Data from fivethirtyeight.com show an average of the most recent state-by-state tracking polls.
Averages as of October 10.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe