International Particle of Mystery

Dark matter escapes its dragnet once again—or does it?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The ­generic line on dark matter is that nobody knows what it is because nobody has seen it. The former claim remains unassailable—any number of hypothetical particles could be dark matter. As to whether or not anybody has seen it, scientists are as divided as ever, and the discourse among rival dark matter hunters is getting chippy.

The controversy centers on an Italy-based research group that runs DAMA, a particle detector that the researchers have claimed for years is picking up dark matter particles. But the group has been secretive about its data, critics say, and physicists have by and large remained skeptical. Indeed, in April a top experimental collab­oration known as XENON100 reported findings that appeared to rule out the possibility that DAMA’s signal came from dark matter.

At issue is not the data so much as what they mean. If dark matter rings the galaxy as theory predicts, Earth should be orbiting through a sea of dark particles, and DAMA should detect this as the yearlong ebb and flow in the “ambient particle environment.” For more than 10 years now, DAMA has been registering blips that fit this pattern. “I think everyone would agree at this point that they see a signal,” astronomer Mario Livio of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore said in May at a dark matter symposium. “The question is, What is it?”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


DAMA researchers have now found, at last, some preliminary validation of their claim to have seen signs of dark matter. A Minnesota detector called CoGeNT has registered seasonal blips akin to what DAMA has seen, physicist Juan I. Collar of the University of Chicago said at the symposium. He cautioned that the data are preliminary but charged that competitors—including one whose results he derided as “pure, weapons-grade balonium”—have been too quick to dismiss DAMA.

CoGeNT may turn out to be the ally DAMA has long lacked, but Collar maintains that he is not taking sides. “Maybe DAMA’s wrong, maybe they’re right, but we have to remain neutral,” he said. “I find myself caught be­­tween the believers and heathens.” The upshot: the field of dark matter research remains as murky as ever. 

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 1This article was published with the title “International Particle of Mystery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072011-6EudohWkAXIM6dRxry0dhj

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe