New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Inventions: 70 Years That Changed the World, 1845–1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Inventions are a dime a dozen. Truly. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office just granted patent number 9,000,000 (to WiperFill in Jupiter, Fla, for collecting rainwater from a car windshield and using it in an environmentally sensible way “to replenish fluids in the windshield washer reservoir.” But who knows? In 10 years either every car will have one or none of them will). An even larger number of inventions do not get patented. And that’s not even looking at worldwide creativity. Let’s face it: most of those inventions may sound great, but they are not useful.

But some inventions do make some money and change the world. Inventions never spring into being fully formed. There is a continuum of invention, a process of ever-greater usefulness and practicality. We use the term “invented” to describe a significant milestone on this path of progress. Inevitably there’s some unfairness involved: we usually neglect quite a long line pioneers who came before; then we neglect those who came close to acheiving the same goal; finally, we short-change those who came after and helped turn the milestone into a practical, widely used device. We rarely mention those who mass-manufacture and sell it currently. And bear in mind the context: the invention of the wheel (5,000 to 6,000 years ago) was less important than the invention of the road; the invention of the light bulb may be less influential than the development of home distribution of electricity.

Elisha Graves Otis, for instance, didn’t invent the elevator. He invented the most significant milestone in that continuum in 1854: a safety device. With that step forward, Otis Elevators became a highly successful company (it is still making elevators) and also changed the landscape: when taking an elevator became safe, more people were willing to ride in them and buildings could be built taller. Otis changed the skyline.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So here are some milestones, from 1845 to 1915, on the path to progress of a few inventions that truly changed the world.

A full account of the path to progress, from the founding of the magazine in 1845 to today, is in the Scientific American Archive, at https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/

Dan Schlenoff was a contributing editor at Scientific American and edited the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column for one seventh of the magazine's history.

More by Dan Schlenoff
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Inventions: 70 Years That Changed the World, 1845–1915” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062015-tzfBOVuaW1mitiLdrSob7

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe