New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Is a Sad Song Sad for Everyone?

Researchers explore how different cultures respond to the same music

The Ramones perform at CBGB in New York City on October 30, 1977.

The ability of music to evoke specific, often powerful feelings is no secret to anyone who has listened to Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 5, Billie Holiday’s “God Bless the Child,” the Ramones’ “I Wanna Be Sedated,” Lizzo’s “Good as Hell” or any of the other countless compositions that have found their way onto Western playlists in the past few centuries.

The emotional effects of music are the point, of course. They are also the subject of a burgeoning field of research around the world in which scientists are exploring the nature of the many “subjective experiences”—such as joy, sadness, anxiety and serenity—that music induces.

In a recent set of experiments, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and their colleagues sought to determine if the feelings that people experience when listening to music “show evidence of universality.” They compared and analyzed how more than 2,800 U.S. and Chinese study participants responded to 2,168 (mostly Western) samples of instrumental music.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As it reports in a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, the team identified 13 distinct and very specific feelings that the Chinese and U.S. subjects shared when listening to music, despite their cultural differences.

The music used in the research, described in the paper as “the richest stimulus set of Western music samples ever studied,” included classical, pop, rock, indie, hip-hop, R&B, country, film soundtracks, and more. An additional 189 samples of traditional Chinese music were also used. In all, the researchers gathered 375,230 judgments of the samples from the study participants.

In the first experiment, subjects listened to Western music samples (each of which was just five seconds long) and reported on the specific feelings they evoked, choosing responses from a list of 28 “categories of subjective experience” provided by the researchers. Terms on the list included “triumphant/heroic,” “sad/depressing,” “joyful/cheerful,” “awe-inspiring/amazing” and “dreamy.” The team then used data-driven statistical modeling to identify the 13 shared experiences.

The second experiment, which included the Chinese music, involved broad evaluations of the samples by participants—such as whether the subjects liked or disliked them or found them exciting or not. A central finding of the study, the researchers write, is that specific feelings “drive the experience of music” more than the broader features. “When we hear a triumphant music sample, for example, somehow it unlocks this feeling of victory, of achievement,” says Alan S. Cowen, a co-author of the paper and currently a visiting faculty researcher at Google. “We’re thinking of something basic about the human experience.”

Comparing Eastern and Western cultures is “a bit of a generalization,” Cowen acknowledges. But “it does capture an axis along which people do vary.” Differences in cultural norms and values noted in the paper include individualism in the U.S. versus collectivism in China and the relative importance of tradition in the two societies.

William Forde Thompson, a professor of psychology at Macquarie University in Australia and director of the school’s Music, Sound and Performance Lab, wonders about the role played by the global influence of Western culture. “The novel finding here is that there is a lot of overlap in how Chinese and American participants assign emotional labels to music,” says Thompson, who was not involved in the research. “This is important information, but it might be explained by the considerable overlap in exposure that participants have to Western media and the emotional vocabulary that is communicated by such media. It seems unlikely the overlap observed between American and Chinese listeners would be observed for all cultural groups, but that is an open question."

That concern is echoed by Samuel Mehr, head of the Music Lab at Harvard University. “The paper raises a lot of interesting questions about how music and emotion work,” says Mehr, who also did not participate in the research. “This is a huge topic and one that we don’t understand very well at all, but [this study] does a better job than any other paper I’ve seen on the topic at figuring out what emotions are there, at least in the music that they are studying. But I don’t think we know at all how this generalizes to other forms of music, other cultures and that sort of thing.”

For their part, Cowen and his co-authors, including principal investigator Dacher Keltner of U.C. Berkeley, address the issue head-on in their paper. “In introducing quantitative approaches to study US and Chinese experiences of music,” they write, “we hope to set the stage for a broader project documenting shared and culture-specific understandings of music around the world. Different experiences may emerge when studying musical traditions from other regions, such as Africa and South America.” Of particular interest, they note in the paper, will be the subjective experiences “associated with music in small-scale cultures with limited Western contact.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe