New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Is Anybody in There?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At first glance, a patient in a persistent vegetative state may appear only to be resting, eyes open. But such patients show no sign of recognizing or interacting with their surroundings, and the likelihood that they ever will decreases as the months pass. Relatives and doctors face the difficult choice between continuing or ending life support, guided only by statistics and each patient's unique clinical profile. That may soon change. Scientists at the University of Cambridge and the University of Liège in Belgium reported that they had used MRI brain-imaging technology to detect signs of awareness in a 23-year-old woman who had been in a vegetative state for five months. “The brain scan showed us that not only was she able to understand speech, she was able to follow simple instructions,” says Adrian M. Owen, lead author of the study.

The researchers first observed that ordinary speech produced responses identical to those of healthy volunteers. Because such activity could be automatic, they then asked the woman to imagine herself at Wimbledon, playing tennis. During this exercise, neurons fired in her supplementary motor area. A request for her to imagine walking through her home activated brain areas responsible for spatial navigation. Owen claims this response proves she was willfully following instructions.

Not everyone agrees. His results provoked a storm of media interest, along with skepticism from some experts. Even Owen is cautious about extending the conclusions of this study to other patients. “They're all different, including their chances of recovery,” he says. But he speculates that by using brain imaging, doctors may be able to carry on two-way “conversations” with some vegetative patients, perhaps getting them to answer simple yes-or-no questions by imagining themselves playing tennis versus navigating their home.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe