New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Is Food Just a Cocktail of Hormones?

Meals alter how cells communicate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It's not very appetizing to think of food as a cocktail of hormones, but it may help explain how diet affects health. “It's really clear,” says Donald Jump, a biochemist at Oregon State University, “that food is just a pile of biochemicals.”

The biochemicals in a cookie or a piece of broccoli can elicit reactions from human cells that are similar to that of hormones, write Randy J. Seeley and Karen K. Ryan of the University of Cincinnati in the February 22 Science. Hormones are chemicals that travel from one part of the body to another and instruct targeted cells to produce a chemical or action.

For instance, in 2010 a team of researchers in California and Japan showed that omega-3 fatty acids from food bind to a specialized protein called GPR120 that studs the surfaces of fat and muscle cells. When an omega-3 fatty acid attaches to the protein like a key in a lock, GPR120 sets off a chain reaction that ultimately protects the body against weight gain and inflammation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Both weight gain and inflammation have been implicated in type 2 diabetes, and Seeley speculates that food choices aimed at enhancing the cellular process triggered by GPR120 and the like might help protect against the disorder.

Fatty acids are not the only hormonelike food elements. Amino acids can activate a chain reaction of events in cells that control cell division and influence the activity of insulin. Vitamin D and other vitamins are involved with the body's immune response. The receptor activated by omega-3 fatty acids is part of a family of proteins called G-protein coupled receptors that convey signals from outside the cell to the interior. Scientists know the specific functions of many members of that family, but they still do not know which molecules turn on some of the receptors, Seeley says.

The missing keys to those locks could be found in food. Translating research findings into clear dietary recommendations, Jump says, will be “a challenge.”

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 5This article was published with the title “It's Your Food Talking” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 5 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0513-22b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe