New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Is Human Impact Accelerating Out of Control?

An Australian researcher wonders "where on Earth are we going?"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

LONDON -- The impact of human activity on the Earth is running out of control, and the amount of time in which action can be taken to prevent potentially catastrophic climate change is rapidly dwindling, a leading scientist from the Australian National University told a global scientific climate conference in London yesterday.

Not only is the impact on the Earth's environment and climate already being seen at all levels, but the damage is accelerating, professor Will Steffen told the opening day of the four-day Planet Under Pressure conference, which has gathered together some 2,800 scientists from around the globe.

"The last 50 years have without doubt seen one of the most rapid transformations of the human relationship with the natural world," he said. "Many human activities reached takeoff points sometime in the 20th century and sharply accelerated towards the end of the century. We saw a 'great acceleration.'"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


He added, "It is the scale and speed of the great acceleration that is truly remarkable. This has largely happened within one human lifetime."

The conference has already declared that the Holocene Epoch is now over and that the Anthropocene -- in other words, the epoch when the impact of human activity will be clearly seen in the future in the geological record -- has already begun.

Steffen said the impact of human activity was already being felt on a planetary level on the carbon, water and nitrogen cycles, citing as an example that people now generate more reactive nitrogen artificially than the planet does naturally.

"Where on Earth are we going?" he asked, pointing to melting ice sheets and vanishing Arctic permafrost, which has the potential to release far more carbon dioxide over coming centuries than is currently produced from burning fossil fuels.

Moving beyond 'critical thresholds'
"The key point is, either we turn around a lot of these trends -- the carbon dioxide trend, deforestation and so on -- or we allow them to continue and push beyond critical thresholds," Steffen said.

Speakers at the conference pointed to the growth of so-called dead zones in coastal areas due to high carbon dioxide emissions as well as phosphorus extraction and fertilizer production, also noting higher air and oceanic temperatures, ocean acidification, biodiversity loss, growing populations and rising water stress.

Professor Diana Liverman of the University of Arizona said there were some hopeful signs -- the rate of population growth is slowing, carbon and energy intensity is starting to decline, and in some areas, forests are growing -- but they are offset by many overwhelming factors.

"Average resource consumption per person, already high in some regions, is growing steeply in emerging economies even as many poor people cannot meet basic human needs," she said. "In some countries, people are consuming far too much, including carbon, water and other resources embodied in trade. We have a long way to go to turn things around."

But sociologist Kari Marie Norgaard of the University of Oregon, who has written a book on the subject of climate change and public attitudes called "Living in Denial," said that while science may be clear -- albeit under challenge from the climate skeptics -- the general public is far from convinced.

"Climate change poses a massive threat to our present social, economic and political order. From a sociological perspective, resistance to change is to be expected," she said. "People are individually and collectively habituated to the ways we act and think. This habituation must be recognized and simultaneously addressed at the individual, cultural and societal level."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe