New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

RFK, Jr.’s assertion that his voice condition is linked to the flu shot is not based in science, experts say

The U.S. secretary of health and human services told USA Today that he believed the flu jab was a “potential culprit” for his spasmodic dysphonia that he could not “rule out”

A medical assistant administers a vaccine in a patient's left arm

A medical assistant administers a flu vaccine to a patient. So far this season, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the virus has caused at least 18 million illnesses and 9,300 deaths.

Chicago Tribune/Getty

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Longtime vaccine skeptic and U.S. secretary of health and human services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., reportedly believes routine influenza vaccines may have triggered his spasmodic dysphonia—a neurological condition that affects the vocal cords and a person’s ability to speak. But the claim, made in a wide-ranging recent interview with USA Today, is unsupported by evidence, experts say.

Kennedy told the outlet that he stopped getting his annual flu shot in 2005. “[Spasmodic dystonia is] why my voice is so screwed up,” Kennedy said, describing the vaccine as a “potential culprit that I cannot rule out. I can’t prove it.”

The comments are “one more assault on vaccine confidence,” says Robert Hopkins, medical director of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. “We do not have any known linkage between flu vaccine and voice disorders like this.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The exact causes of spasmodic dysphonia are unclear; experts suspect different brain areas may be involved and that the condition may have a genetic component.

The Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, meanwhile, says that there is “no evidence” that vaccines cause the condition. “In contrast, preliminary research suggests certain vaccinations may actually be protective against certain forms of dystonia,” the organization states.

An analysis of several common flu vaccine brands by MedPage Today found that only one, FluLaval, has dysphonia listed as a potential side effect. That vaccine was approved for use in the U.S. in 2006, after Kennedy said he stopped getting the flu shot. The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment.

Listing dysphonia as a possible side effect of that vaccine, Hopkins says, “means that there was at least one voice disorder during clinical trials.” That doesn’t constitute proof that dysphonia is linked to the vaccine, he says.

Kennedy’s comments have come amid a particularly severe flu season in the U.S.: so far in the 2025–2026 season, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the virus has caused at least 18 million illnesses and 9,300 deaths, including at least 32 children. According to the CDC, an estimated 90 percent of vaccine-eligible children who died of flu this season were not fully vaccinated.

Flu vaccines, like most medications, can cause side effects, but many have been in use for decades and are safely administered to millions of people every year. “The body of scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports their safety,” the CDC states.

“Flu vaccines are our best tool to reduce everyone’s likelihood of ending up with a severe flu or complications from the flu,” Hopkins says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe