If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Since the 1970s more and more twins have been popping up across the developed world (large graph). Women have been having babies at older ages, so more are becoming pregnant at the natural peak age for twins: about 35. And fertility treatments have become more common, which boosts the chances of twins further (bars above graph). Because multiple births are dangerous for both mothers and babies, public health officials would like to reverse the trend. Sweden, Denmark and a few other countries are turning their twinning rates around with guidelines or regulations that restrict the number of embryos implanted during most in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures (small graphs). That change has also cut the rate of triplets significantly.
Credit: KATIE PEEK; Sources “Twinning Rates in Developed Countries: Trends and Explanations,” By Gilles Pison et al., In Population and Development Review, VOL. 41, No. 4; December 2015 (large graph); “Fertility Treatments and Multiple Births in the United States,” By Aniket D. Kulkarni et al., In New England Journal of Medicine, VOL. 369, No. 23; December 5, 2013 (structure of small graphs); National Center for Health Statistics, 1971–2014 (data in small graphs)
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
Thank you,
Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
