Island of Resistance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the quest to squelch malaria, biotechnologists have sketched plans to introduce a gene into mosquitoes that would confer resistance to the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, which the insects transmit between people. Now it seems that nature may have beat researchers to the punch. A group collected thousands of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from huts in Mali and let some of their offspring feed on blood from an infected villager. Of 101 different pedigrees, a surprising 22 showed no trace of Plasmodium on dissection, reports the group in the April 28 Science. The resistance appears to stem from a gene or genes on a small patch of chromosome the researchers have dubbed the Plasmodium resistance island. Lead author Kenneth Vernick of the University of Minnesota speculates that another strategy to combat malaria might be to selectively target bugs carrying the susceptibility gene variant, perhaps with a recently discovered lethal fungus that appears to prefer Plasmodium-ridden mosquitoes.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Island of Resistance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 33
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-33d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe