New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Island of Resistance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the quest to squelch malaria, biotechnologists have sketched plans to introduce a gene into mosquitoes that would confer resistance to the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, which the insects transmit between people. Now it seems that nature may have beat researchers to the punch. A group collected thousands of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from huts in Mali and let some of their offspring feed on blood from an infected villager. Of 101 different pedigrees, a surprising 22 showed no trace of Plasmodium on dissection, reports the group in the April 28 Science. The resistance appears to stem from a gene or genes on a small patch of chromosome the researchers have dubbed the Plasmodium resistance island. Lead author Kenneth Vernick of the University of Minnesota speculates that another strategy to combat malaria might be to selectively target bugs carrying the susceptibility gene variant, perhaps with a recently discovered lethal fungus that appears to prefer Plasmodium-ridden mosquitoes.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Island of Resistance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 33
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-33d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe