New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

It Detects Earthquakes and Lactose Intolerance

A new suitcase-size spectrometer has many functions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nobel Prize winner C. V. Raman discovered in the 1920s that bombarding a substance with light excites its molecules and scatters the light in a signature pattern that can be analyzed like a fingerprint. Today Raman spectrometers are used in a variety of settings, but they tend to be large and expensive. A team led by physicist Manfred Fink of the University of Texas at Austin is developing a smaller, less expensive model that may improve earthquake detection and bring down the cost of some medical tests.

Fink’s device, which is about the size of a suitcase, does not measure the entire light spectrum but only one featured line containing the known signature for a target molecule. Inside the device, called the Analytic Non-Dispersive Raman Spectrometer, is a small diode laser whose light beam bounces between two concave mirrors to amplify its power. This light amplification also increases the sensitivity of the device, making it possible to measure impurities in parts per billion.

One aim would be to deploy the spectrometer in concert with seismographs to predict earthquakes as much as 45 minutes in advance. Seismographs have trouble distinguishing quake tremors from those that come from other sources, like construction. A spectrometer, however, could detect unusual proportions of gases released by seismic activity into hot springs and fissures in the ocean floor, which might indicate a coming quake.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other researchers are looking into medical applications for the device. Shirish Barve, a gastroenterologist at the University of Louisville, is testing whether it can monitor liver disease by analyzing patients’ breath, and Fink says the device may also be used to detect lactose intolerance in newborns.

A science and environment writer based in Austin, Texas, Melissa Gaskill has a B.S. in zoology from Texas A&M University and a master's in journalism from the University of Texas. She also has a passion for the ocean and writes about it whenever possible for publications such as Nature News, Men's Journal, The New York Times, and many others.

More by Melissa Gaskill
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 2This article was published with the title “It Detects Earthquakes and Lactose Intolerance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022012-5dmQBkRsu6KtHmyYnercOs

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe