New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Questions for the Itch Doctor

The head of a new center that focuses on itch explains the sensation's biological roots and what we still don't know about it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NAME: Zhou-Feng Chen
TITLE: Director, Center for the Study of Itch at the Washington University School of Medicine
LOCATION: St. Louis, Mo.

Why do we need a research center dedicated to itch?
First, chronic itch is a major underreported disease. Many patients—as many as 17 percent of adults, according to one study—suffer from it, and many of them never seek medical help. They think they can scratch it away. Because it’s not cancer, you don’t die from it, so people don’t take it seriously. But a majority of chronic itch is resistant to treatment.

What causes it?
It can be associated with a skin condition such as psoriasis, or it can stem from a systemic disease, such as kidney or liver failure. It can also be a side effect of chemotherapy. Other times it is caused by a deregulation of the nervous system: something is wrong with the nervous system and the itch pathway is activated.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tell me about your current research.
We are trying to understand how our nervous system transmits the itch signal. Three years ago we identified a subset of neurons in the mouse spinal cord through which all itch sensations pass. This raises very interesting possibilities. If those same kinds of neurons exist in the human spinal cord, and if you could block that molecular signaling pathway, you might stop itch transmission and greatly improve someone’s quality of life.

What is the relation between itch and pain?
For a long time, people thought itch and pain were transmitted through the same pathway, that itch was just a weaker form of pain. But now we know that they are transmitted through separate pathways and that they also antagonize each other: when you create pain, you can suppress itch, like when you scratch.

Also, their biological functions are different. When you feel pain, you withdraw to protect yourself. But when you feel an itch, you move your hands toward it. If something attaches itself to your skin, like a mosquito, you want to remove it. So it is possible that the body’s warning system is telling you that something is happening to your skin and that you’d better get rid of it.

What are the main unanswered questions in your field?
We want to know how the itch sensation is caused in the first place. Our discovery of an itch receptor called GRPR and itch-specific neurons was just the first step. The system is so complex that we still don’t know how this information flows in the body, and we also don’t know how different kinds of diseases activate the itch receptor. There are receptors located in the skin, in the brain and in the spinal cord, so it’s extremely complicated. That’s why we need more scientists in different areas working together.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Questions for the Itch Doctor” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072011-6K53EO96UsrH6vcKOVu0OI

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe