It’s Getting Harder for Forests to Recover from Disasters

As the world warms, forests are becoming less resilient in the face of fires, droughts and other disruptive events

Beautiful sunrise the morning fog adds an atmospheric feel to the firs and cedars that

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | Forests around the world are losing their resilience and becoming more vulnerable to disturbances as the planet warms. That’s especially true for ecosystems in tropical, temperate and dry parts of the world, according to a new study.

When a forest loses resilience, it means it’s gradually losing its ability to bounce back after fires, droughts, logging and other disruptive events, said the study, published on July 13 in Nature. Past a certain point, some forests may approach a kind of tipping point — a threshold that launches them into a rapid decline.

And beyond that, some studies suggest, a forest may not be able to fully recover at all. It may instead transform into some other ecosystem entirely, like a grassland or savanna.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The concept of forest tipping points has become a hot topic in climate science in recent years. The vast Amazon rainforest is one of the biggest subjects of concern.

Large swaths of the Amazon already are suffering from the effects of long-term deforestation. Now, many scientists warn that climate change is making things worse. Declining rainfall, increasing drought and devastating wildfires are taking their toll on the iconic rainforest.

Some modeling studies have suggested that continued planetary warming — paired with ongoing deforestation and other human disturbances — eventually will push the Amazon past a point of no return. Beyond this threshold, the ecosystem could enter an unstoppable spiral of decline, eventually transforming from lush rainforest into grassy savanna.

There’s considerable debate about where, exactly, that tipping point may lie. A recent major report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which summarizes the best and most up-to-date climate science from around the world, said that an Amazon tipping point could be possible before the end of the century. But it also notes there’s still a lot of uncertainty about how likely that is.

Shortly after the IPCC report was released, an eyebrow-raising study in the journal Nature Climate Change warned that the Amazon has been losing resilience for at least a couple of decades (Climatewire, March 8). That means it’s already inching closer to its purported tipping point — though the authors of the study say immediate action to protect the rainforest and curb climate change still could save it.

Now, scientists are turning their gaze to the rest of the world. This week’s study looks at forests all over the globe, from the warm tropics to the boreal forests of northern Canada and Russia.

Led by Giovanni Forzieri of the University of Florence in Italy, the research team utilized machine learning techniques to analyze 20 years of data on global vegetation, from 2000 to 2020. They used satellite data on ecosystem productivity — an indicator of the health of the trees — to evaluate the speed and ease with which forests are able to recover from disturbances.

Many northern boreal forests, they found, actually are growing in resilience. Warming and increasing carbon dioxide rates may be offsetting other negative effects of climate change in these regions, the researchers suggest — at least for now.

Still, even some boreal forests are experiencing localized resilience losses, including parts of central Russia and western Canada.

Elsewhere the picture is bleak. Forests in the tropical, temperate and arid regions of the world are experiencing significant declines in resilience.

Intact forests — forests that aren’t managed or harvested by humans — tend to have higher baseline levels of resilience to start. Still, both intact forests and managed forests are losing their resilience over time at similar rates.

That suggests to scientists that the declines aren’t related to human management techniques. They’re probably driven by climate change.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2022. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe