It’s Time to Modernize the Antiquated Definition of Temperature

The quest for an absolute temperature scale heats up

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The most accurate thermometer in the known universe looks nothing like a thermometer. It is a copper vessel the size of a large cantaloupe, filled with ultrapure argon gas and studded with microphones and microwave antennas. The purpose of the gadget, which sits on the campus of the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington, England, is not simply to measure temperature, however. Rather the device and others like it may allow scientists to completely overhaul the concept of temperature and recast it in terms of fundamental physics.

The plan rests on linking temperature to energy via a physical constant. Today the international standard temperature unit, the kelvin, is based on the properties of water, but scientists would like to bring it in line with other measurement units that have been liberated from the vagaries of the macro world. The second is now defined by the oscillations of a cesium atom; the meter relates to the speed of light in a vacuum. “It's bonkers that the kelvin doesn't directly relate temperature to energy,” says Michael de Podesta, who leads the research team.

The NPL device measures the Boltzmann constant, which links changes in energy to changes in temperature. De Podesta's team and its competitors hope to nail down the constant well enough to relate one kelvin to a certain number of joules of energy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new thermometer—technically an “acoustic resonator”—rings like a bell when the physicists feed certain sound frequencies into its microphones. From that sonic resonance, the researchers can determine the speed of sound within the gas-filled cavity and thus the average speed of the argon molecules—that is, their kinetic energy. In July, de Podesta's team reported in the journal Metrologia the most accurate measurement yet of the Boltzmann constant.

The current temperature definition makes use of water's phase changes. One key threshold is the so-called triple point, 273.16 kelvins, where water ice, liquid and vapor can coexist. In 1954 an international agreement defined the kelvin as 1/273.16 the difference between absolute zero and water's triple point.

The 1954 definition works well in general but begins to break down for extreme temperatures, such as those found within stars. “It only happened this way because people started measuring temperature long before they knew what it actually was, before temperature was known to just be atoms and molecules buzzing around,” de Podesta remarks. “Now that we know better and have the opportunity to correct it, we should.”

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk editor for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 4This article was published with the title “The Perfect Kelvin” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 4 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1013-19

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe