New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

It’s Time to Modernize the Antiquated Definition of Temperature

The quest for an absolute temperature scale heats up

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The most accurate thermometer in the known universe looks nothing like a thermometer. It is a copper vessel the size of a large cantaloupe, filled with ultrapure argon gas and studded with microphones and microwave antennas. The purpose of the gadget, which sits on the campus of the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington, England, is not simply to measure temperature, however. Rather the device and others like it may allow scientists to completely overhaul the concept of temperature and recast it in terms of fundamental physics.

The plan rests on linking temperature to energy via a physical constant. Today the international standard temperature unit, the kelvin, is based on the properties of water, but scientists would like to bring it in line with other measurement units that have been liberated from the vagaries of the macro world. The second is now defined by the oscillations of a cesium atom; the meter relates to the speed of light in a vacuum. “It's bonkers that the kelvin doesn't directly relate temperature to energy,” says Michael de Podesta, who leads the research team.

The NPL device measures the Boltzmann constant, which links changes in energy to changes in temperature. De Podesta's team and its competitors hope to nail down the constant well enough to relate one kelvin to a certain number of joules of energy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new thermometer—technically an “acoustic resonator”—rings like a bell when the physicists feed certain sound frequencies into its microphones. From that sonic resonance, the researchers can determine the speed of sound within the gas-filled cavity and thus the average speed of the argon molecules—that is, their kinetic energy. In July, de Podesta's team reported in the journal Metrologia the most accurate measurement yet of the Boltzmann constant.

The current temperature definition makes use of water's phase changes. One key threshold is the so-called triple point, 273.16 kelvins, where water ice, liquid and vapor can coexist. In 1954 an international agreement defined the kelvin as 1/273.16 the difference between absolute zero and water's triple point.

The 1954 definition works well in general but begins to break down for extreme temperatures, such as those found within stars. “It only happened this way because people started measuring temperature long before they knew what it actually was, before temperature was known to just be atoms and molecules buzzing around,” de Podesta remarks. “Now that we know better and have the opportunity to correct it, we should.”

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 4This article was published with the title “The Perfect Kelvin” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 4 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1013-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe