Japanese Whale Hunt Puts Pressure on Australian Government

Anti-whaling activists said on Monday they had captured images of Japanese ships killing protected whales inside an internationally recognized whale sanctuary, sparking criticism of the Australian government's handling of the issue.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Matt Siegel

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Anti-whaling activists said on Monday they had captured images of Japanese ships killing protected whales inside an internationally recognized whale sanctuary, sparking criticism of the Australian government's handling of the issue.

The aerial footage released by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society appeared to show the bloodied remains of three minke whales on board the Japanese factory ship Nisshin Maru as it sailed in the Southern Ocean. The group said it had information that a fourth whale had also been killed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The images have raised pressure on Environment Minister Greg Hunt, who has backed away from a promise made during Australia's election campaign last year to send a ship to monitor Japanese whaling in the area.

His plan to instead send an aircraft staffed by customs officials to randomly swoop over the area has been dismissed by activists as ineffectual.

Bob Brown, a former lawmaker with the Greens party and chairman of Sea Shepherd Australia, called on the conservative Liberal Party-led government to honor its pledge to step up monitoring of the Japanese fleet.

"We've got a federal court ruling that this whaling is illegal and injunction to stop it," he told reporters. "I don't know of any other entity or person in Australia who could simply thumb its nose at the Australian Federal Court with an Australian government saying we won't police it."

Hunt's office dismissed the criticism as political maneuvering, saying it would move ahead with its monitoring plan.

"The whalers have not yet been and are not currently in Australia's search and rescue zone," said a spokesman who declined to be identified, in line with government policy.

The opposition Labor Party, however, accused the government of misleading voters.

"People are entitled to say 'why did they say one thing before the election and another after the election?'," Labor lawmaker Anthony Albanese told reporters.

Australia and Japan have for years been at odds over whaling, which was once practiced by much of the world but is now carried out by only a handful of countries.

Japan catches and kills hundreds of whales in the Southern Ocean each year despite having agreed, under pressure from the United States, to an international moratorium on commercial whaling from 1986.

Japan says it is carrying out scientific research, allowed by a 1946 treaty, to establish whether whale stocks are recovering from over fishing.

Australia says that is a smokescreen for commercial whaling.

The two countries are awaiting the outcome of hearings on the matter held last year at the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ).

(Editing by Jane Wardell and Robert Birsel)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe