New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Java's Jolt Larger for Non-Coffee Drinkers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Legend has it that an ancient Ethiopian goat herder first discovered coffee's stimulating effects when he noticed his animals becoming frisky after eating the wild plant. Centuries later, java is still giving people a buzz. Yet much about coffee's physiological effects remains poorly understood. For instance, the more often a person drinks a cup of joe, the less of an effect the substance seems to have. Now new research, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, investigates this problem by looking at the impact of coffee consumption on exercise capacity in daily drinkers and non-drinkers.

Douglas Bell and Tom McLellan of Defense Research and Development Canada, in Toronto, gave 13 coffee drinkers and eight non-coffee drinkers either a caffeine solution or a placebo. One, three, or six hours after ingestion, the researchers instructed the subjects to exercise to exhaustion. The team found that caffeine increased the amount of time people in both groups could exercise, but non-coffee drinkers enjoyed the largest boost. Additionally, coffee continued to stimulate non-users up to six hours later, whereas by that time the habitual java drinkers had long since come off their high. So it seems that everyone gets a lift from coffee. But in order to get the most bang for your buck in today's gourmet coffee market, perhaps moderation is still the best policy.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe