Java's Jolt Larger for Non-Coffee Drinkers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Legend has it that an ancient Ethiopian goat herder first discovered coffee's stimulating effects when he noticed his animals becoming frisky after eating the wild plant. Centuries later, java is still giving people a buzz. Yet much about coffee's physiological effects remains poorly understood. For instance, the more often a person drinks a cup of joe, the less of an effect the substance seems to have. Now new research, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, investigates this problem by looking at the impact of coffee consumption on exercise capacity in daily drinkers and non-drinkers.

Douglas Bell and Tom McLellan of Defense Research and Development Canada, in Toronto, gave 13 coffee drinkers and eight non-coffee drinkers either a caffeine solution or a placebo. One, three, or six hours after ingestion, the researchers instructed the subjects to exercise to exhaustion. The team found that caffeine increased the amount of time people in both groups could exercise, but non-coffee drinkers enjoyed the largest boost. Additionally, coffee continued to stimulate non-users up to six hours later, whereas by that time the habitual java drinkers had long since come off their high. So it seems that everyone gets a lift from coffee. But in order to get the most bang for your buck in today's gourmet coffee market, perhaps moderation is still the best policy.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe