If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In his monumental series Cosmos, astronomer Carl Sagan famously said that we humans are “made of star stuff.” Dying stars are continually filling the universe with heavy elements, and the energy of the cosmos sparked life into existence on this planet. After billions of years, plants began to harvest sunlight directly, converting solar into chemical energy, and therefore all human life feeds on the output of stars. Those same elements that streamed through the vacuum of space and coalesced in the core of Earth also, it seems, created the conditions under which life can survive.
As writer Marcus Woo details in this issue’s cover story, certain radionuclides in exoplanets may be the signal to look for if we want to find alien life (see “Stellar Smashups May Fuel Planetary Habitability, Study Suggests”). An exciting potential extraterrestrial signal radiated to Earth last December, causing a media stir, as do all prospects of meeting our cosmic neighbors (see “Alien Hunters Discover Mysterious Signal from Proxima Centauri”). Indeed, if we find intelligent life in the universe, we will have a common heritage.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
