July 2008 Puzzle Solution

A great-grandfather makes his family work for their land and fortune

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Solution:

As you can see pictorially here, even if we move M to M', the intersection of the crossing line with Euclid remains the same. The first question is how to prove it. The second is: Where is the intersection point with Euclid?

Call the distance from Euclid to the pine P and the distance from Euclid to the maple M. In what follows, we will count in hundreds of meters. Thus, E is 2 units to the east of the intersection and W is 4 units to the west of the intersection.

Slope of EP is –P/2. Further, when x = 0, y = P.

So, the equation of EP is:
(1) y = (–P/2)x + P
Similarly, EM has the equation:
(2) y = –(M/2)x + M

Slope of WP is P/4, and when x = 0, y = P. So:
(3) y = (P/4)x + P
Similarly, WM has the equation:
(4) y = (M/4)x + M

L is the intersection of (1) and (4) and occurs when:
(–P/2)x + P = (M/4)x + M
x(M/4+P/2) = P – M = x(M+2P)/4

So, at L, x = 4(P–M)/(M+2P)
The y in that case is (from equation 1):
–2P(P–M)/(M+2P) + P = (2PM–2P2+MP+2P2)/(M+2P) = 3PM/(M+2P)

Checking, from equation 4:
M(P–M)/(M+2P) + M = (–M2+PM+M2+2PM)/(M+2P) = 3PM/(M+2P)

R is the intersection of (2) and (3) and occurs when:
(–M/2)x + M = (P/4)x + P

So, it follows that:
M – P = x(P/4+M/2) = x(P+2M)/4
and
x = 4(M–P)/(2M+P)

Substituting in equation (2), we get a y value:
–2M(M–P)/(2M+P) + M = (–2M2+ 2PM + 2M2+ PM)/(2M+P) = (3PM)/(2M+P)

Substituting into (3):
P(M–P)/(2M+P) + P = (MP–P2+ 2MP+P2)/(2M+P) = 3PM/(2M+P)

Now we want the line between the two points L and R:
L is (4(P–M)/(M+2P), 3PM/(M+2P))
and
R is (4(M–P)/(2M+P), 3PM/(2M+P))

prod = (M+2P)(2M+P)

Delta Y = 3PM(1/(M+2P) – 1/(2M+P))
= 3PM(2M+P–M–2P)/prod = 3PM(M–P)/prod

Delta X = 4((P–M)/(M+2P) – (M–P)/(2M+P))
= 4(P–M)(1/(M+2P) + 1/(2M+P)) = 4(P–M)(2M+P+M+2P)/prod
= 12(P–M)(M+P)

Delta Y/Delta X = PM(M–P)/4(P–M)(M+P)
= –PM/4(P+M)

Now check it on L:
3PM/(M+2P) = (4(P–M)/(M+2P))(–PM/4(P+M)) + b
= (–PM(P–M)/(M+2P)(P+M)) + b

So, b = (3PM(P+M) + (–PM(P–M)))/(M+2P)(P+M)
= (2P^2M+4PM^2)/(M+2P)(P+M)

Therefore, we can set y to 0 (meaning we are trying to find a point on Euclid) and ask for the x value at that point:

0 = (–PM/4(P+M))x + (2P^2M+4PM^2)/(M+2P)(P+M)

So, (PM/4(P+M))x = (2P^2M+4PM^2)/(M+2P)(P+M)

Therefore:

x = 4(P+M)(2P^2M+4PM^2)/PM(M+2P)(P+M)
= 4 (2PPM+4PMM)/PM(M+2P)
= 8PM(M+2P)/PM
= 8

So, just look 8 units (800 meters) east on Euclid.

Can you find a solution that requires less algebra?

The essence of this problem (like last month's) comes from the nice elementary geometry text by Edwin Moise and Floyd Downs entitled Geometry (ISBN 0-201-25335-6, Addison-Wesley, 1991).]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe