June 2008 Puzzle Solution

Sir Birnie's Will - How a 14-year-old solved the mystery of an apparently miserly grandfather

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's not necessary to deal with the neighbors at all. If T is where the bisector of angle QYZ intersects the bisector of QXR, then it will also be the point where the bisector of YZR will intersect the bisector of QXR. Here is why:

(i) The angle bisector of QYZ is the set of all points that are equidistant from YQ and YZ.

(ii) The angle bisector of YZR is the set of all points that are equidistant from YZ and ZR. (A pair of perpendiculars to YZ and ZR are shown.)

(iii) Therefore, the point where the two bisectors intersect is a point that is equidistant from ZR and YQ.

(iv) Such a point must lie on the bisector of YXZ. So, the point of intersection of all three bisectors must agree at the maple tree M.

Map of Solution

This elegant proof is due to a 14-year-old boy named Tyler.

The essence of this problem comes from the nice elementary geometry text by Edwin Moise and Floyd Downs entitled Geometry (ISBN 0-201-25335-6, Addison-Wesley 1991).

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe