Jupiter Moon Just a 'Pile of Rubble'

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Galileo spacecraft, which was launched 13 years ago, is scheduled to crash into Jupiter in September 2003. On its final flyby of the planet last month, the probe came within 160 kilometers of Amalthea, one of Jupiter's many moons. Findings from that encounter, reported this week at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union, indicate that the strangely-shaped inner moon is full of empty space. "The density is unexpectedly low," notes John D. Anderson of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). "Amalthea is apparently a loosely packed pile of rubble."

Previous Galileo images of Amalthea allowed researchers to determine the volume of the 270-kilometer-wide moon. With the new data, the NASA team calculated its density and determined that overall, the moon is about as dense as ice. But the conditions surrounding Jupiter do not suggest an icy composition. Instead, the scientists posit that the Jovian moon consists of a large collection of solid chunks with empty gaps between them. "It's probably boulder-size or larger pieces just touching each other, not pressing hard together," Anderson says. The results indicate that Jupiter's inner moons survived some tumultuous times. According to Torrence Johnson of JPL, "Amalthea may have formed originally as one piece, but then was busted to bits by collisions."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe