Jupiter may not be the shield against Earth-threatening asteroids and comets that researchers have assumed it was (depicted in this artist's conception).
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Jupiter may not be the shield against Earth-threatening asteroids and comets that researchers have assumed it was (depicted in this artist's conception). Astronomers simulated the paths through the solar system of rocky objects called centaurs, which give rise to a family of comets passing near Jupiter. The absence of Jupiter would not change the number of comets approaching Earth, although the presence of a Saturn-size planet in its place would increase that number by directing comets our way, the group from England's Open University reported last week at the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
