Karen Handel: New Georgia Congresswoman’s Views on Health Care

Handel, a Republican, wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act but protect preexisting conditions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Karen Handel defeated Jon Ossoff for the highly contested 6th Congressional District seat in Georgia on Tuesday night. This race was the most expensive congressional race in U.S. history and a key victory for Republicans who want to hold on to their majority despite polls showing their vision for health care is widely unpopular.

Handel will replace Tom Price, the former orthopedic surgeon who vacated the seat to become President Trump’s health secretary. Her win continues Republicans’ control over Georgia’s 6th District, a seat they’ve held since 1979.

The 55-year-old Handel, Georgia’s former secretary of state, spent much of her campaign praising the American Health Care Act passed by House lawmakers this past spring. Here are five things to know about Handel’s positions on health care issues:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1. Repeal Obamacare

Handel says the Affordable Care Act is “collapsing” and wants to replace it with the AHCA. She does, however, concede the AHCA has its flaws. She believes the final bill should treat states like Georgia, which opposed Medicaid expansion, in a more “equitable way” through “market-based, patient-centered reforms.”

2. Protect preexisting conditions

Handel, whose sister was born without an esophagus, says she wants to preserve preexisting condition protections and believes the Republican plan does just that. During one recent debate, she said “the bill in the Senate right now provides more protections for individuals with preexisting conditions.”

3. End the individual mandate

Handel said in a recent debate that monthly premiums for insurance for her and her husband purchased through the Obamacare individual market skyrocketed from $350 to $1,200. (She didn’t say over how many years the increase occurred.) On the campaign trail, the longtime fiscal conservative expressed her support for the AHCA, even if the replacement plan isn’t perfect, because it would free people from the burden of an individual mandate.

4. Strike abortion funding

Handel is anti-abortion. She caught flak on the campaign trail for her role in getting the Susan G. Komen foundation, which supports breast cancer screenings, to pull funding from Planned Parenthood in 2012. Handel, who resigned after public backlash forced the foundation to reverse its decision, ultimately wrote a book about the ordeal. One thing’s clear: When Republican lawmakers try again to defund Planned Parenthood, they’ll have an ally in Handel.

5. Avoid single-payer insurance

Handel opposes single-payer health care, in part, because of the long waits she’s seen in other nations embracing that sort of system.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on June 20, 2017

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe