New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Keep Your Eyes on the Eyes

For nonhuman primates, camouflaged eye movements clearly serve a purpose.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Unlike other primates, the whites of human eyes contrast sharply with our colored irises and dark pupils. One theory suggests that our eyes evolved this way specifically to make it easier to figure out the direction of another person's gaze. If this theory is correct, you would expect humans to pay more attention to eye orientation than other primates do.

To find out, researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig compared the behavior of adult chimps, gorillas, bonobos and human children.

A person stood in front of the ape or child and looked up and to the sides, either moving only his head, only his eyes, or both his head and eyes. Apes and children both looked where they thought the experimenter was looking. But the apes paid the most attention to the motion of the head, whereas the children paid the most attention to the motion of the eyes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But why would humans evolve easy-to-read eyes? For other primates, camouflaged eye movements clearly serve a purpose. “For nonhuman primates, you don't want anybody to see what you're looking at. You want to eat it, or mate it, or chase it,” states Brian Hare, a biological anthropologist who co-authored the paper. Instead Hare says we evolved to make it easy for everyone to see where we were looking. The advantages of cooperation through mutual gaze must have been so great that they outweighed the advantage of a poker face.

Kurt Kleiner is a freelance writer living in Toronto.

More by Kurt Kleiner
SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Keep Your Eyes on the Eyes” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 1 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0207-11a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe