Delinquent Youths Boost Older People's Self-Esteem

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The image of a retiree complaining about the local kids is so ubiquitous it has become a cliché—everyone knows that each generation loves to be appalled by the behavior of those born later. Now research confirms this observation and suggests that by thinking about youngsters getting in trouble, older people are actively boosting their self-esteem.

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick of Ohio State University and her colleague Matthias Hastall of Zeppelin University in Germany asked people between the ages of 50 and 65 to read articles in a magazine under the guise of becoming familiar with the publication. In a subse­quent survey, the participants who read experimenter-created articles about the trouble young people got them­selves into reported higher levels of self-esteem. The more the older subjects looked at the articles about the bad behavior and ill fortune of younger people, the more their self-esteem rose. Knobloch-Westerwick explains this as a classic case of schadenfreude—people feel good about the misfortunes of a group to which they do not belong.

For 18- to 30-year-old volunteers, however, the reverse was not true. Knobloch-Westerwick suggests that in our youth-idealizing culture, older people are simply marginal in the eyes of the young. [For more on the psy­chology of schadenfreude, see “Their Pain, Our Gain,” by Emily Anthes; Scientific American Mind, November/December 2010.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Editor's note: This story was originally titled in print as "Kids These Days."

SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Kids These Days” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 6 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0111-12b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe