New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Delinquent Youths Boost Older People's Self-Esteem

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The image of a retiree complaining about the local kids is so ubiquitous it has become a cliché—everyone knows that each generation loves to be appalled by the behavior of those born later. Now research confirms this observation and suggests that by thinking about youngsters getting in trouble, older people are actively boosting their self-esteem.

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick of Ohio State University and her colleague Matthias Hastall of Zeppelin University in Germany asked people between the ages of 50 and 65 to read articles in a magazine under the guise of becoming familiar with the publication. In a subse­quent survey, the participants who read experimenter-created articles about the trouble young people got them­selves into reported higher levels of self-esteem. The more the older subjects looked at the articles about the bad behavior and ill fortune of younger people, the more their self-esteem rose. Knobloch-Westerwick explains this as a classic case of schadenfreude—people feel good about the misfortunes of a group to which they do not belong.

For 18- to 30-year-old volunteers, however, the reverse was not true. Knobloch-Westerwick suggests that in our youth-idealizing culture, older people are simply marginal in the eyes of the young. [For more on the psy­chology of schadenfreude, see “Their Pain, Our Gain,” by Emily Anthes; Scientific American Mind, November/December 2010.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Editor's note: This story was originally titled in print as "Kids These Days."

SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Kids These Days” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 6 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0111-12b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe