In an Aesop fable, a thirsty crow wanting to drink from a pitcher must first raise the water level, so he drops pebbles in the container. In real life, the Eurasian jay can perform the same task. But just how smart is it?
Researchers challenged jays and human children with puzzles like the one in the fable. And until the kids reached the age of eight, their results were similar to the birds'. The study appeared in July in PLoS ONE.
In one test, a prize was put in a tube of either water or sawdust. About half the birds needed multiple trials to learn that dropping stones into the liquid, but not the dust, lifted the reward up to within reach.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
When children between four and seven were faced with the same test, they learned in a similar fashion, taking about five trials to realize that the token in the water tube could be retrieved—although they did pick up the task faster than the birds. Older children learned more quickly, and those aged eight or older solved it the first time they tried.
COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/oct2012
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
